Who are we to judge11/21/2023 ![]() ![]() If the situation should change in Rwanda, it could be reviewed.Īt prime minister’s questions, Sunak made clear that he would “finalise” a new treaty with Rwanda in light of the supreme court’s judgment. The president of the supreme court, Lord Reed, made clear that the court’s decision was based on the available evidence, which showed that the rights of asylum seekers would be at risk in Rwanda. What would the government have to do now to send people to Rwanda? Rishi Sunak told MPs after the judgment that he was planning to finalise a new deal with Rwanda. In a statement, the new home secretary, James Cleverly, declined to rule out a scheme that sends asylum seekers to a third country, saying there was “clearly an appetite for this concept”. It will prevent the UK government from lawfully removing anyone to Rwanda, based on the evidence as it currently stands.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |